The Problem

Global Warming

Remaining carbon Budget as of 22 Aug 2024

spiner
The Carbon Clock is loading...
The Carbon Clock is currently unavailable, please try again in a few minutes.

Data:  Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (mcc-berlin.net)

Remaining Carbon Budget

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), evaluates scientific data related to climate change, including estimates of the remaining CO2 emissions budget to limit global warming to 1.5°C / 2°C. This data, last updated in the summer of 2021, underlies the MCC Carbon Clock.

IPCC bases the carbon budget on the near-linear relationship between cumulative emissions and temperature rise, considering the lag between CO2 concentration and its temperature impact. With annual emissions from fossil fuels, industrial processes, and land-use change estimated at 42.2 gigatonnes (1,337 tonnes per second), the 1.5°C / 2°C budgets are expected to be exhausted in approximately 3 and 21 years from January 2026, respectively.

Realtime countdown of the remaining carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions budget until global warming reaches a maximum of 1.5°C / 2°C above pre-industrial levels.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), evaluates scientific data related to climate change including estimates of the remaining amount of CO2 that can be released into the atmosphere to limit global warming to a maximum of 1.5°C / 2°C.  This data was last updated in summer 2021, and is the basis of the MCC Carbon Clock.

IPCC bases the concept of a carbon budget on a nearly linear relationship between the cumulative emissions and the temperature rise.  There is, however, a lag between the concentration of emissions in the atmosphere and their impact on temperature to be taken into account.  With the starting point of annual emissions of CO2 from burning fossil fuels, industrial processes and land-use change estimated to be 42.2 gigatonnes per year [or 1,337 tonnes per second], the 1.5°C / 2°C budgets would be expected to be exhausted in approximately 5 and 23 years from August 2024, respectively.

Am I also contributing?

Are we thinking about the emission of greenhouse gasses such as methane and carbon when we do day to day activities like: driving a car, using energy to cook or heating our houses? Probably not. But by doing this we are making our small but constant contribution to the problem of Global Warming. We see from worsening weather disasters around the world that this returns as a boomerang back to our houses and families.

>80%

of all natural disasters were related to climate change

24.29%

USA share of global world cumulative CO₂ emission

100 million

people can be pushed into poverty by 2030 because of climate change impact

We agree this is really happening!

The overall trend in global average temperature indicates that warming is occurring in an increasing number of regions. Future Earth warming depends on our greenhouse gas emissions in the coming decades.

At present, approximately 11 billion metric tons of carbon are released into the atmosphere each year. As a result, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is on the rise every year, as it surpasses the natural capacity for removal.

10

warmest years on historical record have occurred since 2010

>2°F

is the total increase in the Earth's temperature since 1880

>2x

warming rate since 1981

Understanding the ultimate consequences of current trends

Observations from both satellites and the Earth’s surface are indisputable — the planet has warmed rapidly over the past 44 years. As far back as 1850, data from weather stations all over the globe make clear the Earth’s average temperature has been rising.

In recent days, as the Earth has reached its highest average temperatures in recorded history, warmer than any time in the last 125,000 years. Paleoclimatologists, who study the Earth’s climate history, are confident that the current decade is warmer than any period since before the last ice age, about 125,000 years ago.

The Solution Has Several Parts

What can be done to stop it?

Increase the usage of Hydrogen

Clean hydrogen has 3 main uses: energy storage, load balancing, and as feedstock/fuel. Used in all sectors, including steel, chemical, oil refining & heavy transport. Actions to accelerate decarbonization & increase clean hydrogen use include:

  • Invest in clean hydrogen supply;
  • Increase hydrogen demand as fuel/feedstock;
  • Use hydrogen for clean high-temperature heat;
  • Use hydrogen as low-carbon feedstock for ammonia/fertilizer;
  • Use hydrogen as clean fuel for heavy transport;
  • Create policies incentivizing electric power decarbonization;
  • Utilize hydrogen as a means for storing energy over extended periods;
  • Improve electrolyser technology & readiness in heavy industry/liquid transport fuels;
  • Increase use of Methane Pyrolysis & Water Electrolysis for clean hydrogen production;
  • Increase use of wind and solar in electricity production systems.

Increase the usage of Electricity

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving carbon neutrality requires widespread renewable energy and a huge increase in vehicles, products, and processes powered by electricity.

Electricity generated from increasingly renewable energy sources is the right way to create a clean energy system. Switching from direct use of fossil fuels to electricity improves air quality by reducing emissions of local pollutants.In order to increase the use of electricity, we can do the following:

  • Use more electric cars. Compared to traditional combustion engine vehicles, electric cars show a 3-5 times increase in energy efficiency;
  • Increase your electricity consumption within your household;
  • Upgrade your home with smart technology. Electrical appliances can be digitized with smart technology;
  • Use electric heat pump heating. Heat pumps use 4 times less energy than oil or gas boilers;
  • Electrify industrial processes in order to reduce energy intensity.

No Carbon Fuel News from Canary Media

Go to News

What is hydrogen?

icon

Lightest and most abundant

As the foremost element in the periodic table, hydrogen holds a unique position in the universe, given its status as the lightest and one of the most ancient and abundant chemical elements.

icon

Never alone

Hydrogen, in its pure form, needs to be extracted since it is usually present in more intricate molecules, such as water or hydrocarbons, on Earth.

icon

Fuel of stars

Hydrogen powers stars through nuclear fusion. This creates energy and all the other chemicals elements which are found on Earth.

Biggest Human Usages

Ammonia Production

Hydrogen is an essential part for manufacturing Ammoniam Nitrate fertilizers. Half of the world's food is grown using hydrogen-based ammonia fertilizer.

Methanol Production

Hydrogen is used in the production of methanol, where hydrogen is reacted with carbon monoxide to produce chemical feedstocks.

Electricity generation

Hydrogen fuel cells make electricity from combining hydrogen and oxygen. Power plants are showing increased interest in using hydrogen, and gas turbines can convert from natural gas to hydrogen combustion.

Vehicles fuel

Hydrogen is an alternative vehicle fuel. It allows us to power fuel cells in zero-emission electric drive vehicles.

Concrete Production

Hydrogen heat is used in order to reduce emissions in the manufacturing process.

Steelmaking

Steelmaking is an industry that is beginning to successfully use hydrogen in two ways to eliminate almost all greenhouse emissions from the steelmaking process.  First for Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) replacing coke (from coal) with hydrogen to remove oxygen from iron ore. Second for heat to melt the iron ore into DRI and then into low carbon steel.

Space exploration

Liquid hydrogen has been used by NASA as a rocket fuel since the 1950s.

Chemical Industry

Hydrogen is used in production of explosives, fertilizers, and other chemicals; to convert heavier hydrocarbons to lightweight hydrocarbons to produce many value-added chemicals; to hydrogenate organic compounds; and to remove impurities like sulfur, halides, oxygen, metals, and/or nitrogen. It's also in household cleaners like ammonium hydroxide.

Pharmaceutical Industry

Hydrogen is used to make vitamins and other pharmaceutical products.

Glass and Ceramics

In the production of float glass, hydrogen is needed to provide heat and to prevent the large tin bath from oxidizing.

Food and Beverages

It is used to hydrogenate unsaturated fatty acids in animal and vegetable oils, to obtain solid fats for margarine and other food products.

Oil Refining

Using clean hydrogen makes it possible to reduce emissions while "cracking" heavier petroleum into lightweight hydrocarbons to produce many value-added chemicals.

Read More

Goals

The World needs MORE hydrogen, to move toward Turquoise and Green hydrogen, and away from Grey hydrogen

goals diagram

Where We are Now

  • The temperature trend shows the increase can reach 5.9°F (3.28°C) by 2050
  • High CO2 emissions (7-8 kg CO2 /kg H2)
  • Only 2% produced with carbon capture (2Mt)
  • Worldwide 98% Hydrogen production (94 Mt) without carbon capture emits CO2(900 Mt)
  • 62% from methane without carbon capture
  • Fossil Fuel electricity generation pollutes the environment
  • Fossil Fuel provides 33-35% efficiency
diagram

What We Want to Achieve

By 2030

  • 25% Produced(24Mt) with carbon capture
  • Stop more climate change limiting warming to 2.4°F (1.3°C) by 2050
  • Hydrogen for low-carbon industrial heat
  • 100% Hydrogen as a sustainable industrial feedstock

Statistics Source: IEA Global Hydrogen Review 2022

Most Common Hydrogen Sources

These methods now produce 85% of the world's Greenhouse Gas carbon emissions

grey hydrogen method

SMR (Steam Methane Reforming) + WGS (Water Gas Shift)

SMR is a way of producing syngas (Hydrogen and Carbon monoxide) by mixing hydrocarbons (like natural gas) with water. This mixture goes into a special container called a reformer vessel where a high-pressure mixture of steam and methane comes into contact with a nickel catalyst. As a result of the reaction, hydrogen and carbon monoxide are produced.

To make more hydrogen, carbon monoxide from the first reaction is mixed with water through the WGS reaction. As a result, we receive more hydrogen and a gas called carbon dioxide. For each unit of hydrogen produced there are 6 units of carbon dioxide produced and in almost all cases released into the atmosphere.  Carbon dioxide is a harmful gas causing climate change.

$863 ($0.86 per kilogram of Hydrogen)

(Electricity = $474 + Methane $383 + Water $6 US EIA May 2024*)

SMR + WGS with Carbon Capture

The SMR method involves combining natural gas with high-temperature steam and a catalyst to generate a blend of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Then, more water is added to the mixture to make more hydrogen and a gas called carbon dioxide.

For each unit of hydrogen produced there are 6 units of carbon dioxide produced. In a few experimental trials, to help the environment, the carbon dioxide is captured and stored underground using a special technology called CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage). This leaves almost pure hydrogen.

One of the main problems with carbon capture and storage is that without careful management of storage, the CO2 can flow from these underground reservoirs into the surrounding air and contribute to climate change, or spoil the nearby water supply. Another is the risk of creating earthquake tremors caused by the storage increasing underground pressure, known as human caused seismicity.

$1,253 ($1.25 per kilogram of Hydrogen)

(Electricity $474 + Methane $505 + Water $4 US + CCS $270 EIA May 2024*)

blue hydrogen

Newer, Clean Hydrogen Sources

Turquoise Hydrogen

Methane Pyrolysis

This technology based on natural gas emits no greenhouse gases as it does not produce CO2. Methane Pyrolysis refers to a method of generating hydrogen by breaking down methane into its basic components, namely hydrogen and solid carbon.

Oxygen is not involved at all within this process (no CO or CO2 is produced). Thus, for the production of hydrogen gas there is no need for an additional of CO or for CO2 separation.

$1,199 ($1.20 per kilogram of Hydrogen)

(Electricity $433 +Methane $766 EIA May 2024*)

More About Turquoise Hydrogen
green-method

Electrolysis

The concept of Green Hydrogen involves generating hydrogen from renewable energy sources by means of electrolysis, a process that splits water into its fundamental constituents, hydrogen and oxygen, using an electric current. This process can be powered by a range of renewable energy sources, such as solar energy, wind power, and hydropower.

The electricity used in the electrolysis process is derived exclusively from renewable sources, ensuring a sustainable and environmentally-friendly production of hydrogen. It generates zero carbon dioxide emissions and, as a result, prevents global warming.

$3,289 ($3.29 per kilogram of Hydrogen)

(Electricity $3,278 + water $11 US EIA May 2024*)

More About Green Hydrogen

Natural Hydrogen

(Emerging New Source)

Natural geologic hydrogen refers to hydrogen gas that is naturally present within the Earth's subsurface.

Known as "White" hydrogen, it can be generated through various geological processes. The study of geologic hydrogen and its potential as an energy resource is an active area of research, as it holds promise for renewable energy applications, particularly in the context of hydrogen fuel cells and clean energy production.

It's important to note that the creation of geologic hydrogen is generally a slow and long-term process, occurring over geological timescales. This is because the other methods are human production technology methods and this is creation by a natural phenomena. The availability and abundance of geologic hydrogen can vary significantly depending on the specific geological setting and the interplay of various factors such as rock composition, temperature, pressure, and the presence of suitable reactants.

Here are some of the main sources and mechanisms of geologic
hydrogen generation:

01

Serpentinization

Serpentinization is a chemical reaction that occurs when water interacts with certain types of rocks, particularly ultramafic rocks rich in minerals such as olivine and pyroxene. This process results in the formation of serpentine minerals and produces hydrogen gas as a byproduct. Serpentinization typically takes place in environments such as hydrothermal systems, oceanic crust, and certain tectonic settings.

02

Radiolysis

In regions with high concentrations of radioactive elements, such as uranium and thorium, the decay of these elements releases radiation. This radiation can interact with surrounding water or other fluids, splitting the water molecules and generating hydrogen gas through a process called radiolysis. This mechanism is believed to contribute to the production of hydrogen in certain deep geological settings, such as deep groundwater systems and radioactive mineral deposits.

03

Geothermal activity

Geothermal systems, which involve the circulation of hot water or steam through fractured rocks, can generate hydrogen gas as a result of various processes. High-temperature hydrothermal systems can cause the thermal decomposition of hydrocarbons, releasing hydrogen gas. Additionally, the interaction between water and hot rocks in geothermal reservoirs can lead to the production of hydrogen through serpentinization or other geochemical reactions.

04

Abiotic methane cracking

Abiotic methane refers to methane gas that is not directly derived from biological sources, such as microbial activity. In certain geological environments, abiotic methane can be generated through processes like thermal decomposition of organic matter or reactions between carbon dioxide and hydrogen. This methane can subsequently undergo thermal or catalytic cracking, producing hydrogen gas.

Success Stories

Steps Taken by Different Countries to Move Forward to Net Zero Emissions

96

£4 billion

100 MW+

1st place

green hydrogen plants are owned by Australia. It possesses the highest count of establishments globally. Australia is expected to have the lowest costs of green hydrogen production by 2050 due to an abundance of solar and wind resources.

was committed by the UK to hydrogen technology and production facilities by 2030 to cultivate a hydrogen economy and create 9,000 jobs.

green hydrogen production sites are being developed by Canadian company First Hydrogen in Quebec and Manitoba. These plans are being developed in conjunction with Canadian and North American automotive strategies.

in the list of largest hydropower producers in the world belongs to China. It is followed by Brazil, USA and Canada.

By 2047

In 2017

200,000

110 countries

green hydrogen will help India make a quantum leap toward energy independence. The country’s National Hydrogen Mission was launched in 2021.

Japan became the first country to formulate a national hydrogen strategy as part of its ambition to become the world's first "hydrogen society" by deploying this fuel in all sectors.

fuel-cell electric vehicles production by 2025 is the goal stated by South Korea. In 2021, South Korea also approved the Hydrogen Power Economic Development and Safety Control Law, the first in the world to promote hydrogen vehicles, charging stations, and fuel cells.

have legally committed to reach net zero emissions by 2050.

Conclusion

The World needs MORE hydrogen

SMR + WGS

SMR + WGS

Keep current hydrogen production methods BUT

+

Clean Hydrogen Production Methods

Clean Hydrogen Production Methods

make additional steps to broaden them with cleaner production methods

=

More Hydrogen

more hydrogen

And as a result the world will get more vital hydrogen and become one step closer to net zero emission

Сurrent Situation

The market is dominated by grey hydrogen produced from natural gas through a fossil fuel-powered SMR process. Every year, the production of grey hydrogen amounts to approximately 70 to 80 million tons, and it is primarily used in industrial chemistry. More than 80% is used for the synthesis of ammonia and its derivatives (fertilizer for agriculture, 50 perecent of food worldwide) or for oil refining operations. Unfortunately, for every 1 kg of grey hydrogen, almost 6-8 kg of carbon dioxide is emitted into the atmosphere.

More than 95% of the world's hydrogen production is based on fossil fuels with greenhouse gas emissions. Nevertheless, to achieve a more stable future and promote the transition of pure energy, the global goal is to reduce the use of other “colors” of hydrogen and focus on the production of a clean product, such as green or turquoise hydrogen. Reaching the zero carbon footprint will require a gradual transition from grey to green/turquoise hydrogen in the coming years.

It is possible to produce decarbonized hydrogen. An option is to use another feedstock, namely water, and convert it in large electrolyzers into H2 and oxygen (O2), which are returned to the atmosphere. If the electricity used to power the electrolyzers is 100% renewable energy (photovoltaic panels, wind turbines, etc.), then hydrogen becomes green. Currently, it is about 0.1% of the total production of hydrogen, but it is expected that it will increase since the cost of renewable energy continues to fall.

Go to Graphs

What Does the Data Say about Climate Change?

U.S. Additions to Electric Generating Capacity

U.S. additions to electric generation capacity from 2000 to 2025. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports that the United States 
is building power plants at a record pace. As indicated on the chart, nearly all new electric generating capacity either already installed or planned 
for 2025 is from clean energy sources, while new power plants coming 
on line 25 years ago, in 2000, were predominantly fueled by natural gas. New wind power plants began to come on line in 2001 and new solar plants, 10 years, later in 2011. Since 2023, the U.S. power industry has built more solar than any other type of power plant. The EIA predicts that clean energy (wind, solar, and battery storage) will deliver 93% of new power-plant capacity in 2025.

Download PDF
Download PDF

Surface Air Temperature

Global surface air temperature departures between 1940 and 2024 from the average temperature for the period 1991-2020 (averages below the 11-year average are blue and those above are red). The average in October 2024 was +0.80 degrees Celsius above the reference period average, down from +0.85 degrees Celsius above the reference period average in 2023, which was the warmest October on record.

Download PDF
Download PDF
More Graphs
arrow

Go to No Carbon News

(© 2024 No Carbon News)

Explore the Most Recent Updates and Projects for an Eco-Friendly Tomorrow

(© 2024 Energy News Network.)

all News

Metal powders help fuel rockets. Now they could heat up factories, too.
Mar 9, 2026

When rockets blast off Earth, they rely on tiny metal powders to help propel them into space. Now, an emerging group of startups and scientists is hoping to harness these particles for something more terrestrial: producing carbon-free energy for factories.

Powdered iron can be combusted in industrial boilers to supply the hot water and steam needed to produce everything from beer and baby formula to paper and plastic resins — without directly emitting carbon dioxide. The concept is about a decade old, but companies are just starting to make serious inroads to put the technology into practice.

Last week, the Dutch startup Renewable Iron Fuel Technology, or Rift, said it raised almost 114 million euros ($131 million) in private financing and public grants to develop its first commercial project, making it a front-runner in the space. Rift already operates two pilot units in the Netherlands. With the new investment, the firm plans to build a fuel-production plant and deploy its boilers in about 10 industrial facilities in Europe, the first of which is set to fire up in 2029.

“This represents a concrete step toward decarbonizing industrial heat at scale,” said Mark Verhagen, CEO of the Eindhoven-based Rift.

Around the world, most factories burn fossil fuels to get the heat they need for industrial processes, which is why the sector accounts for more than one-third of energy-related CO2 pollution globally. Rift estimates that its current system can reduce emissions by almost 80%, on a life-cycle basis, when compared with those of a fossil-gas-fired boiler.

The startup is seeking to scale at a pressing time in the European Union, where manufacturers are facing tighter restrictions on emissions and new policies aimed at shifting factories toward cleaner heat sources. The region is also grappling with ballooning gas prices caused by Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine — and now the U.S. and Israel’s war on Iran.

Rift’s approach replaces gas with iron, a highly energy-dense and abundant element that is ground down to resemble sand.

The startup begins by putting iron powder in a specialized boiler, then injecting air and making a little spark that yields a big flame. As the iron burns, it produces heat that can be used directly for manufacturing or district-heating networks. To start, Rift is focused on supplying medium-temperature heat, of around 250 degrees Celsius (482 degrees Fahrenheit).

“The only product that remains are the ashes,” Verhagen said.

Rift will initially use a small amount of virgin iron powder, sourced from industrial suppliers. But the goal is to continually recycle the ashes — which are pure iron oxide — to make new fuel. When combined with low-carbon hydrogen, iron oxide splits into water and iron powder, the latter of which will be returned to the boiler.

As a technology, iron fuel has plenty of hurdles to overcome before it can replace gas in factories. Researchers are still improving the iron-combustion process and the techniques for collecting iron oxide. Companies need to build up supply chains for sourcing and recycling iron powder. And using green hydrogen — the kind made with renewable energy — for fuel production remains challenging, given that supplies are limited and costly.

Developers also need to bring down their production costs in order to compete with the incumbent fossil fuels. Rift, for its part, is working to improve its economic performance with the buildout of its first commercial project, Verhagen noted. The company says it can currently deliver iron fuel for a price of 140 euros per metric ton.

The investment round announced on March 3 includes more than 83 million euros in Series B funding, led by the Dutch pension fund PGGM, as well as a grant of nearly 31 million euros from the EU’s Innovation Fund. Rift had previously raised 11 million euros from investors in 2024, which enabled it to conduct durability tests at its two pilot projects.

“We have closely followed Rift’s development and see strong potential for tangible industrial impact,” Tim van den Brule, investment director at PGGM Infrastructure, said in a press release. ​“Many industrial innovations stall in the transition from demonstration to realization,” he added, which is why the firm is providing Rift with capital ​“through to execution.”

Rift is not alone in this fledgling field. Other players include the Dutch startup Iron+ and the Canadian firms Altiro Energy, FeX Energy, and GH Power, along with Ferron Energy in Australia and Fenix Energy in France.

The companies can all trace their roots to early research efforts led by Philip de Goey from Eindhoven University of Technology and Jeff Bergthorson from Montreal’s McGill University. The professors were inspired to pursue metal fuels for energy purposes after observing how powders burned at the European Space Research and Technology Centre in the Netherlands. In particular, they saw iron powder as an appealing alternative to gaseous hydrogen fuel — which has been held up as a more direct replacement for fossil gas but is difficult to store and transport.

In 2020, Eindhoven researchers and students, including Verhagen, built their first 100-kilowatt iron fuel boiler at a nearby brewery. That year, Rift spun out of the student team, with support from the Bill Gates–led Breakthrough Energy Fellows program. The startup later launched a 1-megawatt system that provides heating to some 500 homes in the Dutch city of Helmond; it operates another pilot unit at a cleantech park in Arnhem.

In 2025, Rift signed its first customer contract with the Dutch firm Kingspan Unidek, which makes building insulation and plans to install an iron-fueled boiler at one of its plants.

Verhagen said that, as well as with slotting into existing operations like Kingspan’s, the technology could also work alongside other types of clean-heat solutions that are gaining momentum globally, such as thermal batteries, which store electricity to provide on-demand heat, and highly efficient industrial heat pumps.

Iron fuel could serve as the ​“baseload” source that supplements electrified technologies, or that kicks in when electricity prices are high or otherwise constrained. ​“We see that there’s a unique fit” for Rift’s system, he said.

North Carolinians band together to help their neighbors electrify
Mar 6, 2026

After Susan Lindsay got rooftop solar panels installed on her home in Greensboro, North Carolina, she wanted the low-income households she visited as a parent educator to be able to do the same — but without the expense.

“I realized how hard that would be for any of these families I was working with, but also how quickly it reduced my energy burden,” she said. ​“I started looking around for people trying to get clean energy into the hands of people who don’t make as much money.”

Soon, Lindsay found a coalition of groups working to solarize their communities. The basic concept has been around for nearly two decades: Organizers vet installers, negotiate prices, and recruit as many residents as possible to go solar during a limited sign-up window. The more participants, the lower the cost, thanks to the power of bulk purchasing.

As part of Solarize the Triad — a campaign that covers the north-central region of North Carolina, anchored by the cities of Greensboro, Winston-Salem, and High Point — Lindsay raised money and in-kind donations to help low- and moderate-income families go solar. Plus, she said, ​“I introduced my neighbors to all the ways they could get solar panels,” and many did. ​“I feel like I multiplied my contribution.”

Indeed, in a campaign that ran from July 2024 to the following May, Solarize the Triad led to three houses of worship and over 70 households installing solar. Now, Lindsay is among those kicking off a similar effort called Electrify the Triad, which officially launched last Saturday. The latest initiative focuses on electrification: switching out gas heat, stoves, and hot water appliances for electric versions; installing EV chargers; and increasing efficiency — all steps to reduce fossil-fuel combustion, improve indoor quality, and lower household bills.

Lindsay plans to participate in the program, too — not just recruit for it. ​“I’m doing this because I really want to be more energy-efficient and to help other people be more energy-efficient,” she said. ​“It’s not enough for me just to make my house work. We need to do this collectively.”

When it comes to electrification, ​“information is power”

Backed by many of the same nonprofit partners that made Solarize the Triad a success, including the Piedmont Environmental Alliance and the North Carolina League of Conservation Voters Foundation, the electrification initiative includes contractors ready to install electric heat pumps, hook up induction stoves, upgrade electrical boxes, and make other energy-saving home improvements.

Undergirding Electrify the Triad is Bright Spaces, a Georgia-based firm that has supported over 20 Solarize campaigns around the country by bringing organizers, installers, and participants together through its online platform. Electrify the Triad is its third electrification effort; the others are in the Atlanta suburb of Decatur and Buncombe County, home to Asheville, where the company also has an office.

Of course, not all lessons from Solarize the Triad — a discrete project focused on one technology — will translate to the electrification campaign, which has no set end date. The key benefit of Electrify, said Ken Haldin, development partner for Bright Spaces, is that organizers identify contractors and help participants navigate how to cut costs and reduce their carbon footprint when they’re ready.

“With solar, you either have it or you don’t,” Haldin said. The options under the electrification umbrella, by contrast, are myriad, and a homeowner could swap out old, inefficient appliances with electric versions over time, rather than all at once. ​“It’s less binary than solar is. It’s much more a matter of choice and timing.”

The new campaign comes at a key moment for households looking to ditch their gas appliances. While the Trump White House and congressional Republicans have already eliminated some tax credits for home solar and efficiency and are attempting to dismantle others, the administration of North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein, a first-term Democrat, is pushing in the opposite direction.

Last year, North Carolina was the first in the country to launch a home energy rebate program created with funds from the Biden-era climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act. State officials announced last month that the cash-back program aimed at low- and middle-income households, which was rolled out in phases, is now available in all 100 counties. Each family can access up to $14,000 for electrification and up to $16,000 for home energy-efficiency upgrades.

Participation in Electrify the Triad isn’t limited by income, but the state rebates will help expand it to scores of households that otherwise might not be able to afford the up-front cost of high-efficiency appliances, added insulation, and other energy-saving measures, even though the outlays will pay for themselves over time in the form of lower utility bills.

“Information is power,” Haldin said. ​“If you can be guided on the proper way to move forward” on electrification, he said, ​“then you’re already on a money-saving track. And if someone can point you to an incentive that’s applicable, now you’ve redeemed a coupon you didn’t know you had.”

Building on the success of Solarize

Among the designers and planners of Electrify the Triad is Shaleen Miller, sustainability and intergovernmental relations director for Winston-Salem. While the city’s climate target of carbon neutrality by 2050 is limited to its own vehicles, buildings, and other operations, she said, ​“what’s good for the city residents is good for the city.”

Now that the program is officially launched, other members of the team are beginning outreach. That includes Dawn Lewis, a retiree who, with her husband, recently moved from Austin, Texas, to Winston-Salem to be closer to her adult children on the East Coast.

In Texas, Lewis, a member of the United Methodist Church, had embraced the ​“creation care” philosophy. ​“Creation is this incredible gift, and we’re asked to do a good job of taking care of it, and we’ve kind of done a horrible job,” she explained. ​“So, it’s important for us to go out there and try to resolve that.”

After starting a creation care group at her church in Austin, she formed a network of groups from other Methodist churches around the city. ​“I’m working to do that same thing here,” she said, starting with Ardmore United Methodist Church in Winston-Salem and expanding to other houses of worship throughout the Yadkin Valley.

Lewis, who also participated in Solarize the Triad, said many of the same organizing tactics will apply to Electrify: reaching out to neighborhoods, businesses, and communities of faith to have person-to-person and group conversations.

“The hope is to try to get as many people as possible aware, educated, and then engaged,” she said. ​“Solarize was successful. I think this will be, too.”

Why US LNG firms stand to profit from Iran war fallout
Mar 6, 2026

See more from Canary Media’s ​“Chart of the Week” column.

The U.S. is the world’s largest exporter of liquefied natural gas — and the war in the Middle East is about to bring massive profits to its gas producers.

As the war destabilizes oil and gas production in the region, LNG prices have shot up globally. Qatar — a U.S. ally and the world’s second-largest LNG supplier — halted production of the fuel on Monday after Iranian drones targeted its energy facilities in retaliation for ongoing U.S. and Israeli strikes. The country accounts for one-fifth of the global LNG supply, and the vast majority of its output goes to Asia.

Analysts say American suppliers could be in for a windfall as desperate international buyers bid top dollar to secure what fuel is available. U.S. LNG export terminals are already operating at full bore, so there is unlikely to be a surge in the volume of gas sent abroad — just in the profits firms rake in on each shipment.

Already, the effects of the energy shock are rippling across the world.

In India, the government began rationing natural gas on Tuesday. Meanwhile, Taiwan, which gets 40% of its electricity from LNG and imports heavily from Qatar, said it will take immediate measures that include sourcing more gas from the U.S.

In Europe, natural gas prices have risen less sharply than in Asia but still enough to exacerbate energy affordability problems in the region, which was plunged into an energy crisis following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. After mostly quitting Russian gas, Europe has come to rely heavily on LNG from the U.S., though in recent months it has sought to diversify through deals with Qatar and other countries as the Trump administration threatened to annex Greenland.

Since returning to power last January, the Trump administration has pushed to further expand the nation’s lead in LNG exports, despite warnings from analysts that doing so will drive up costs at home. Before the war broke out, the U.S. Energy Information Administration forecast that natural gas prices would climb for Americans in 2027 in part due to expanding LNG exports. The country is already on track to double its LNG export capacity by 2029.

Amid this expansion, Trump has been pressuring allies from Japan to the EU to buy even more U.S. natural gas. But the war only strengthens the case against a deeper dependence on LNG. The more a country relies on shipped-in energy, the more vulnerable it is to global shocks like the one unfolding now.

Renewables, in contrast, are a source of refuge. You install them once and for decades they produce electricity that, though tied to the weather, is completely insulated from global energy markets. Just look at Europe: The region doubled down on wind and solar following the Russian gas crisis, not because of concern for the climate but because of a desire to make its energy system as self-sufficient as possible.

Now, yet another war underscores the perils of relying on imported energy in an increasingly volatile world.

More Posts
>